Design reading notes

Alberto Cairo — legal full-text readings

Alberto Cairo — legal full-text readings

thefunctionalart.com (primary domain) is currently suspended (hosting CGI error). Full blog essays were read from the active mirror http://thefunctionalart.blogspot.com/ and from Nightingale / conference write-ups that quote him. No pirate copies of The Functional Art, The Truthful Art, How Charts Lie, or The Art of Insight were downloaded.

---

1. Correlation, causation, and deceitful charts (Why I wrote How Charts Lie)

Notes

  1. 1. Uses Charlie Kirk’s “Democratic mayors → America’s worst cities” tweet-table as a case of bullshit (Frankfurt): indifference to truth, not merely falsehood.
  2. 2. Cities are not run like prisons with absolute mayoral control; “worst” is undefined and unmeasured.
  3. 3. Large cities show both extremes (crime and culture/wealth) by probability of size, not party alone.
  4. 4. Causal arrow may reverse: diverse, educated big cities elect Democrats; correlation ≠ causation.
  5. 5. How Charts Lie is about how we lie to ourselves with charts—intent to deceive is secondary to projection/confirmation bias.
  6. 6. Audience reactions that “buy” the correlation show remaining literacy work.
  7. 7. This post is Cairo’s own short essay linking a current example to the book’s thesis (not a book chapter dump).

---

2. Another grossly incompetent lying chart by climate deniers

Notes

  1. 1. Critiques a Global Warming Policy Forum chart as axis-cropped cherry-picking.
  2. 2. Starting ~2014 coincides with El Niño-warm years; short windows can fake “cooling.”
  3. 3. Honest climate conversation needs long-term trends (points to Datagraver / NASA explanations).
  4. 4. Related liar’s toolkit (warned even when not used here): picking nominal regional temperatures instead of anomalies vs multi-decade baselines.
  5. 5. Distinguishes chart-critique competence from climate-science expertise (self-disclosure: he isn’t a climate scientist).
  6. 6. Lying charts can come from motivated cropping, not only fabricated numbers.

---

3. Idealism and pragmatism in visualization

Notes

  1. 1. Occasion: readers fault a WaPo chart for putting time off the X-axis; Cairo asks whether people can still understand it—and whether rhetorical payoffs (partisan left-right emphasis) can justify the flip.
  2. 2. “What makes a graphic good” = whether actual people learn/enjoy it, not proximity to an ideal of Truth/Beauty.
  3. 3. Rejects “universal rules of visualization” analogy: writing has grammar but no one rule for all genres.
  4. 4. Via Murray Dick: dominant functionalist-idealist discourse (Tufte, Bertin) treats viz as scientific monosemic logic with a priori rules.
  5. 5. That discourse assumes designer and audience share one irreducible “truth”; Cairo says they often don’t.
  6. 6. Clarity/efficiency/boringness are relational (person × graphic), not intrinsic properties of chart types.
  7. 7. Tufte’s “principles” should be guidance “within reason,” not rigid checklists; fans often apply them too strictly.
  8. 8. Cairo’s predominant discourse is pragmatist: ad hoc reasoning from aims, constraints, conventions, trade-offs, evidence, taste.
  9. 9. Norms emerge bottom-up from craft dialogue, not top-down from “leaders.”
  10. 10. Prefers horizontal peer conversation over hierarchical thought-leader lists.
  11. 11. Audience benefit is central—and “benefitting” ≠ always “max information in min time.”
  12. 12. Labels his stance also pluralistic (many dialects) and “hedonistic” in the philosophical sense (welfare/pleasure as moral goods)—not vulgar excess.

---

4. A few key paragraphs from The Art of Insight (posted draft)

Notes

  1. 1. Respects but disagrees with Tuftean/Bertinian functionalist-realist discourse.
  2. 2. Affirms Murray Dick’s label: Cairo’s writing is pragmatist.
  3. 3. Prefers horizontal conversations among kind collegial peers over top-down “thought leaders.”
  4. 4. Teach justification and reasoning, not “rules.”
  5. 5. Reasoning driven by goals, constraints, trade-offs, outcomes, imperfect evidence, conventions, taste—aimed at audience benefit.
  6. 6. Names this the hedonistic shift.
  7. 7. Explicitly a draft excerpt, not a claim to have posted the full book.

---

5. The Collaborative Blueprint: Open Visualization Academy (Nightingale)

Notes

  1. 1. OVA goal: free Creative Commons (BY-NC) library of information design / viz / literacy courses.
  2. 2. Seed: 2012 Knight Center MOOC “Introduction to Infographics and Data Visualization” (huge demand; many career origin stories).
  3. 3. Germinated while finishing The Art of Insight interviews—wish to host admired designers’ courses openly.
  4. 4. Funded partly via Knight Chair discretionary budget; long-horizon main project.
  5. 5. Course style: scrappy, chatty, limited imperfection—anti-sanitized TED/ChatGPT polish.
  6. 6. Instructors told: rigorous and personal; no view-from-nowhere generics (e.g., want Frank Elavsky’s accessibility take).
  7. 7. Ethos: viz/journalism as ways of being and seeing together, not only technique lists.
  8. 8. Mentorship model: honor early newspaper mentors’ “high kindness”; pay it forward.
  9. 9. Cadence: ~one new course/month; open to outsider proposals with sample videos.

---

6. The Day I Thought I Misled the President… (Nightingale / Medium)

Notes

  1. 1. Personal narrative around Hurricane Dorian + Trump’s Alabama tweet, framed through How Charts Lie’s hazard-map chapter.
  2. 2. Cone of uncertainty = abstract possible positions of storm center over ~5 days; center can fall outside the cone.
  3. 3. Living near cone boundary still warrants preparation; cone ≠ full damage footprint.
  4. 4. Cairo briefly feared his NYT Sunday explainer (same day) somehow confused Trump into naming Alabama—then rejects that as unlikely.
  5. 5. More plausible: advisors’ wind-probability maps (~10% tropical-storm chance for Alabama) misread by non-experts.
  6. 6. Doubling-down eroded trust in NWS/NHC—institutions lives depend on (cites Monmonier; Lewis The Fifth Risk).
  7. 7. Closing gag: spaghetti-map caption “If anything on this graphic causes confusion, ignore the entire product.”
  8. 8. Demonstrates Cairo’s public pedagogy: teach how to read official uncertainty graphics under political stress.

---

7. Six ways Alberto Cairo thinks you can improve your data visualizations (Storybench report of talk)

Notes (arguments attributed to Cairo in THIS report)

  1. 1. ~1/3 of Americans can’t properly read a scatterplot; “graphicacy” lags viz abundance → misinformation risk.
  2. 2. Numbers/graphics make messages more persuasive even when poorly related to the claim (“perfect storm” of misinformation).
  3. 3. Don’t look—read visualizations; they have grammar; “data never speaks for itself.”
  4. 4. Check and disclose sources; noncomparable sources (Vox cataract-cost example) invalidate charts.
  5. 5. Don’t over-infer; “a chart shows what it shows—and nothing else”; ideology drives false connections (ACA annotation example).
  6. 6. Prefer clarification over simplification—sometimes more data/context is needed.
  7. 7. Treat sharp boundaries as surrounded by uncertainty “clouds”; Catalonia poll MoE example → “tied,” not decisive majority.
  8. 8. Ethical thinking: reduce bias impact even if imperfect; win arguments with good evidence and good viz.

---

8. Alberto Cairo’s tips for more effective data visualization (IJNet report)

Notes (as reported)

  1. 1. Don’t oversimplify: “Stories are always more complicated than they seem at first.”
  2. 2. Add context—graphics alone are like a title without an article (Emanuel health-care book praised for surrounding charts with explanation).
  3. 3. Find patterns without fooling yourself (Feynman); don’t mix incomparable figures.
  4. 4. Be creative and skeptical of creativity; stay on facts; annotations guide reading; viz are to be read.
  5. 5. Focus on what matters: medium (mobile = sequences/layers) and audience; responsibility to humanity before artistic ego.

---

9. Author bio landing page

Notes

  1. 1. Self-description: designer, educator, Knight Chair; books listed including How Charts Lie and The Art of Insight.
  2. 2. Points to Open Visualization Academy as latest free open educational project.
  3. 3. Consulting/teaching testimonials emphasize balancing function and beauty, exploration before “the right chart.”
  4. 4. Not an essay; useful only as portal/context.

---

Not read in full / blocked / excluded

ItemStatus
http://www.thefunctionalart.com/SUSPENDED — hosting error; not readable
NYT interactive “Those Hurricane Maps Don’t Mean What You Think They Mean” (Aug 29, 2019)NOT read in full — WebFetch timed out / hard to retrieve; arguments reconstructed only via Cairo’s Nightingale essay + search snippets
Brown Institute Q&A (brown.columbia.edu/cairo-qa/)NOT read in full — fetch timed out
Washington Independent Review of Books interviewNOT read in full — Cloudflare bot wall
Full books (Functional Art, Truthful Art, How Charts Lie, Art of Insight)Excluded — copyrighted; only author-posted excerpts/notes used
Blog post “How Charts Lie clarifications and edits”Errata list only; not summarized as an argumentative essay
LGBTQ-charts video post (Feb 2023)Video talk pointer; full spoken argument not transcribed as text

---

Search-loop note

Further searches for Cairo / Functional Art / How Charts Lie excerpts repeatedly returned the same blogspot, Nightingale, Storybench, and NYT URLs. Stopped when duplicates dominated.